Who has children and still goes to work, yahoo clever

So I have 2 children (4 + 6 years) and still go to work, currently only in the mornings and on weekends because it is not possible otherwise.

But notice in the area that very few mothers ever go to work or plan to work at all?

Is it really like that?

How do you finance your life??

Don’t want to attack anyone, just ask for your own interest..

You may be correct. I live pretty rural (but I’m a city girl ;-)

no, my children both went to kindergarten at the age of 4, used the parental leave to dedicate myself to the children

12 answers

So my mother works from the birth of my brother and then me, but she never let us down despite that and she doesn’t have such a pleasant job .

We get along quite well

my brother is just 20 and I am 16 because of that, but even before it was not so much the prob. It was hard for them because they do a lot at the same time have to has .. But it will. I think you will do it the way my mother did, otherwise you wouldn’t be a mother and I don’t know you but I wish you the best of luck =)

Lovely wishes

  • Sign in to reply to replies

Many want to do that, only the state throws clubs between their feet!

  • Sign in to reply to replies

I think that should be left to the individual parents (couples).

The only thing I think is important is that children come to kindergarten – if not three, then four or five – but I think it is important that a child gets contacts and is not only with mom – even if the mother stays at home.

My son is now 17 months old, because my job was limited when I became pregnant, I am now unemployed – I unfortunately had to refuse an offer to cooperate with a former business contact because my son needed me especially at that moment. My son is now starting in August in a children’s group (parent initiative) that was founded especially for children of that age. He only stays there for an hour or two a day – then he’s only 21 months old – and we’ll see how well it works and whether it’s good for him or if it’s still too early.

I was always of the opinion that children should stay at home with mom for the first three years if possible – or with father – but after watching my son develop I see it a little differently.

Simply because I realize how much he needs the other children and how much he benefits from contacts to others – also to other adults from my family who look after him from time to time if I drop out (recently, for example, when I was sick)

Whether or not I will go back to work depends on how my son settles into the children’s group. If that goes very well, I will then quickly find a job or start my own business, accepting orders as before.

But I do it very much depending on what impression I have – whether my child is already far enough to cope with it. I’m not going to bend and break him into the kids group just because I want to work. not if it turns out that he may still be a little too small for it.

But I honestly believe that he will like it there – simply because he has developed more and more in the past few months to become interested in other children so much that mom or all other adults are then virtually de-registered – as long as he "if necessary" still has a dear adult – a loving educator – he doesn’t need mom all the time ;-)

But what I find frankly violent is – I know a woman who sends her exactly one year old child to a group of children in August – all day long. and it must be, then she works full again. I would have to admit that it would be too risky simply because I want to keep the option open for myself and my son to say something if necessary "ok, it was too early, let’s try again when he’s a little older!"

In this respect – I’m currently still receiving HartzIV. But that should change as soon as possible – as soon as my son has settled in well in a group of children, I would like to take on orders again – partly because I * hate * getting HartzIV – and partly because I like the work – especially that Project work – which has always done well – makes you confident and satisfied and simply gives life a little more.

But I would never say "I absolutely have to work" if I knew my child needed me especially (if my son had a serious illness, for example, I would be at home immediately, and it would make no difference to me whether I have to receive state benefits – my child comes first! I’ve already known a woman Child had severe leukemia, and she didn’t even visit her 8-year-old daughter in the clinic because she didn’t want to get sick leave "just" to visit the child. )

RELATED ITEMS

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Christina Cherry
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: