Where to with the child Re-education to wrong sense of responsibility

Everything was better before. In terms of family, this probably applies completely. The state is increasingly replacing the mother of our children today and, to make matters worse, this is not only tolerated, but even demanded.

Those who raise their children themselves either seem stupid, a troublemaker or simply unable to find a job. Public opinion is already twisted. Now it is a matter of deriving a legal basis from the new apparent habit. We are losing the last influence on our children.

Eva Hermann recently published a harrowing report on the arbitrariness of the Salzkotten authorities in North Rhine-Westphalia, which unequivocally revealed the power of these authorities. Just like homeschooling, these cases concerned the official paternalism of parents. It is obviously more than undesirable for the people to take care of the upbringing of their children themselves.

From the article by Ms. Hermann at the Kopp publishing house on April 22, 2010:

The state does not like so much independence from parents. He intervenes! It shows the indomitable, where the hammer is hanging: The fines have also increased continuously in the past two years. Is it arbitrary? One could almost assume this, in one case the fine increased from 250 euros to 1,000 euros within two years! The number of prison days is also growing: in some families in which the mothers have already been arrested several times, the fathers now have to go again; however, they no longer get by with a week in prison, but in three cases enforcement sentences of 20 or 40 days have now been ordered!

Put yourself in the shoes of these parents. They are not doing anything illegal since their attitude is supported by a judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court. Actually. But what use are such judgments and laws if the authorities violently oppose them and ignore them?

As consequences for those affected, one thing quickly comes to the other. In addition to the reputation that these families lose due to the lack of support from the press or even from the usual false propaganda, father or mother will certainly soon have to deal with the loss of their job.

As a rule, the employer should not care about the personal fate of his employees, since he would have to worry indirectly about his reputation. Employees who are in prison or who are “repeat offenders” are definitely damaging the reputation of the bread maker. And which boss feels like having to justify himself externally with the real backgrounds? The blue letter will then come quickly.

With this illegal act of violence, the authorities are doing exactly what they want. If the parents are not financially independent, they are blackmailed in this way until they have to give up on their own. Although the “non-socially compliant” attitude of the “unteachable” can never be “corrected”, the result is nothing, because in the end the parents will always lose out in this banana republic.

But who is really surprised that the authorities are committing this arbitrary insanity more and more often today, while the public is watching idly? Brainwashing and social restructuring are already well advanced. On April 21, 2010 the Spiegel with an article heading offered us a deep insight into the long-destroyed soul of our broken society:

Back to work – only where to go with the child?

The problem: "Women in my situation are almost always tied hands because they cannot find childcare for their child," says the 26-year-old from Hamburg. Intzen is a single parent and her daughter is only three years old.

Not so long ago, it was absolutely normal to say, naturally and not discriminatively, that mothers naturally have to take care of raising children. Career also played almost no role for women. Take a look at any mammalian mother. What would her boys do if the mother took care of everything but her? You would die excruciatingly.

Already this comparison with the animal world is so politically incorrect today that one hardly dares to pronounce it. This behavior reflects exactly what the creator deliberately implemented with intention, every connoisseur of GNM knows – purely biologically – to confirm this. Otherwise, our creator could have simply equipped humans with reproduction by laying eggs.

From the point of view of the modern paternity state, this would be ideal because every mother could conveniently hand in her eggs to the local hatchery and would not even have to go on maternity leave. The parents could even leave the entire "rearing" to the reproductive authority and only then pick up their offspring fully matured years later or simply leave it to the state entirely.

It is not only the humanistic obstruction of normality that is to blame for the perverse deportation of children that is common today, but quite simply the survival needs of single mothers, who are often single. Because those who do not work starve. It is not quite as blatant with us, but society in turn has instilled in people to have to participate in consumer life. It is a compulsory event. Those who cannot or do not want to do this are on the sidelines. So most of them inevitably play along.

Intact families are no longer the norm today. So-called patchwork families and often single mothers in particular are booming. How many children can still grow up in a healthy environment? In how many cases does a mother take care of her little one full-time? Which children still experience having at home either grandma or mother, as was once the custom?

Take a look at your immediate surroundings. Do you know a family where more than two generations really live under one roof? This case has become the absolute exception – two or three generations ago it was still the norm.

A mother who now exclusively looks after her own children is asked by friends often enough whether she doesn’t want to work again or when she will go back to work or whether she has already found all-day care for the offspring. Showing and caring for children becomes a hobby instead of the life of so-called "modern families".

It is bad to see this fundamental trend. But that’s not all: the individual is no longer left to choose, the decision is made by the authorities, tolerated and supported by the general public. Those who train their children at home or want to protect them from – in their eyes – wrong teaching, not blindly leaving them to the state and its henchmen, will be put down and locked up.

All parents who oppose this educational state terror deserve respect. Due to the shift in public opinion towards voluntary paternalism and the increasing destruction of families, the imprisonment of the "cross drivers" will soon become a matter of course. We don’t live in good times. The world has finished.

Related Posts

• 

  Child poverty in germany: everything you need to know about it

  Child poverty in Germany: Not only is money missing Germany is considered a rich country. The economy is doing well, unemployment is at a record low. But…

• 

  Separation: how do parents explain this to the child? Baby and family

  Separation: How do parents explain this to the child? Sometimes the separation is inevitable – even with parents. But how do you tell your child? A…

• 

  Separation with child: all information

  Separation with child How do I tell my child? Happy family with mom, dad and the kids: that’s what many couples want. but sometimes it just doesn’t fit…

• 

  I don’t enjoy playing with my child – what to do?

  I don’t enjoy playing with my child What to do if playing with your own child is not fun? Many parents feel like their child’s sole entertainer. Mom me…